Nuclear war risk is ‘higher’ now than the Cold War after US and Russia treaty ends

The last remaining nuclear arms pact between Russia and the United States has expired, setting the stage for what many fear could be a new, unconstrained nuclear arms race.

Russian President Vladimir Putin last year said he was ready to stick to the treaty’s limits for another year if Washington did the same, but US President Donald Trump has been noncommittal.

Russia’s Foreign Ministry on Wednesday night said in a statement that it was ‘no longer bound by obligations within the treaty’ and was ‘free to choose its next steps’.

Florian Eblenkamp, advocacy officer with The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) told BADVIBES he believes the world is already in the middle of an arms race.

 

‘What people often get wrong is that the Cold War stayed “cold” because leaders realised the risk of nuclear war was too high,’ he explained.

This realisation led to a series of arms control and disarmament agreements, almost all of which are now gone or dysfunctional – making the risk ‘even higher’ now than it was in the Cold War, he warned.

US President Donald Trump watches a military demonstration at Fort Bragg, a US Army military installation, near Fayetteville, North Carolina, on June 10, 2025. (Photo by Brendan SMIALOWSKI / AFP) (Photo by BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images)
It’s necessary to promote a universal ban on nuclear weapons, Eblenkamp said (Picture: AFP)

‘This arms race may not stay cold forever. Nuclear weapons are becoming “thinkable” to use again. That is why we must continue promoting a universal ban,’ he added.

The New Start Treaty, signed in 2010 by then-US president Barack Obama and his Russian counterpart Dmitry Medvedev, restricted each side to no more than 1,550 nuclear warheads on no more than 700 missiles and bombers – deployed and ready for use.

 

Yet, the agreement, while important on capping nuclear limits, was a sort of ‘band-aid’ for the nuclear issue, Eblenkamp said.

He also said the idea that each country should have its own nuclear weapons in the name of ‘safety’ is a foolish idea.

‘Quite the opposite would happen,’ he said. ‘This is especially true for countries in Europe. A potential nuclear war between the US and Russia would be fought without European governments having any control over that risk.’

MYKOLAIV, UKRAINE - 2024/07/03: A disarmed RT-23/SS-24 missile silo with intercontinental ballistic missile seen in the Museum of Strategic Missile Forces. After the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Ukraine held about one-third of the Soviet nuclear arsenal, the third largest in the world at the time, as well as significant means of its design and production. In 1994 Ukraine agreed to destroy the weapons and to join the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). One of the former Unified Command Posts was converted into the Strategic Missile Forces Museum and is now part of the National Military History Museum in Kyiv. The museum represents a launching position with a shaft launcher, an underground command post, and above-ground service facilities. The Museum of Strategic Missile Forces is located in Mykolaiv region. During the Soviet period, this missile base was off-limits to the public and was managed by the 46th Red Flag Division of the Nijniodniprovska Missile Order of the October Revolution. (Photo by Mykhaylo Palinchak/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)
There are many diarmed ballistic missiles in various countries (Picture: SOPA)

Eblenkamp argued that removing American nuclear weapons stationed in European countries and removing Russian nuclear weapons stationed in Belarus would be a significant step toward sanity.

 

When all is said and done, the expiration of the New Start treaty is a symptom of a larger issue.

‘With trust eroding between the US and Russia, there will be more reliance on other countries to facilitate this arms race. The UK and other European countries are right in the middle of it, and that’s a problem.

‘I don’t think anyone feels safer because Donald Trump has control over nuclear weapons on British soil,’ he said.

More From Author

Men wish their partners would do this one thing more often — and it’s not sex

I’m sick of the government taking all my income, so I buy gold

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *